The Temple of Athena and the Temple of Fortuna Virilis

This paper will comp ar and contrast the Temple of genus genus Athene Nike (a Greek building) with the Temple of Fortuna Virilis (a Roman building). The Temple of Athena Nike was hurl in the late fifth century BC, and it is one of the buildings on the Acropolis of Athens. Although it is much smaller than the surrounding structures, the temple has a whir of prominence, because it is the first thing visitors see when they arrive at the Acropolis (Tansey and Kleiner 156). The bewilder for the temple was created by the architect Kallikrates. It is rectangular in shape, and it contains a small room, known as a cella, with an open door at its antecedent. In front of the cella, there is a portico, or porch, which is fairly shallow in depth. The temple as a whole is raised on a three-tiered platform, which is extended in front in order to form steps get word up to the portico. The original roof is now missing, but it was probably sloped and triangular-shaped, as seen in ot her Greek temples of the time. in that respect is a row of four columns along the front of the temple, and other row of four columns along the back.

A temple having this features (columns on the front and back of the structure, but not on the arrays) is referred to as an ?amphiprostyle? temple (Kimball and Edgell 76). The columns of the Temple of Athena Nike are of the bean order. As described by Watterson, the principle laurel of the dome order ?is a double volute or catalogue which sweeps across the top of the column with a fluent tendency and then curves down on each side and almost in an ever diminis hing verticillate? (Watterson 31). With it! s distinctive spiral scroll shape on its capital tops, If you exigency to snuff it a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper