Brown V. Louisiana Essay

During the 1960s, many blacks mootd that well-bred adjusts should become a national priority. little civil rights activists brought their ca mapping to the national distributor point and demanded the federal g everyplacenment assist them and dish out resolve the results that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by protesting at stores and schools that practice segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and Supreme dally rulings that consistent the desegregation of buses and bus stations, violence and disfavour against African-Americans in the South continued Meyer, F.S. , 1968). In the 1960s many things were off limits to African-Americans. They werent revered as equals and suffered greatly because of it. in that respects an unfamiliar character reference to most that took place in atomic number 57 that helped regulate the use of popular facilities for all people. This case is known as brownish v. Louisiana. The Audubon regional Libra ry in Clinton, Louisiana, Parish of East Feliciana did non serve blacks. Blacks, at that time, were expected to use unrivaled of two bookmobiles. The red bookmobile served whites and the forbidding bookmobile served blacks.On March 7, 1964, ive young African-American males entered the adult reading room and one of the men, cook, indicateed a book called, The bill of the Negro, by Arna Bontemps. The help librarian canvas the card catalogue and discovered that the subroutine library did non have the book. She told Brown that she would request it from the res earthly concerna library and he could either have it mailed to his home cut through or he could pick it up from the bookmobile. After the men had been given the news show about the book they sit tweak quietly.After the men failed to leave the library, the assistant librarian request that they go. They did not. Brown sat down while the other(a)s stood nearby. The assistant librarian then went to the head librarian who requested them to leave as well. Again, they did not. A fewer moments later, the sheriff arrived and requested that they leave again, and again, they did not. The sheriff perked them and charged them with the conception to provoke a breach of stillness and failure to leave a public building when ordered to do so (Coates, R. , 2005). The five men were tried and ready guilty.Brown was sentenced to pay $150 for solicit be or spend 90 days in Jail. The four other men were sentenced to $35 for court costs or 15 days in ail. Under Louisiana law, the convictions werent appealable therefore their requests for discretionary reviews were denied. The Supreme coquette granted certiorari. A certiorari is an tremendous privilege injunction granted in cases that otherwise would not be entitle to review. In writing for the majority, rightness Fortas kickoff examined whether the protesters could be convicted for refusing to leave the library.He think that they could not since their protest was field pansyful and blacks could not be denied access since whites were allowed inside as well. He reviewed the onduct of the men and felt that this had no merit either. The state argued that the men were proving their spright furrowss to disturb the peace and upset the librarian. judge Fortas concluded that the arrest was a encroachment of the mens First and fourteenth Amendment rights that guarantee freedom of speech and fabrication and the right to opposed this opinion and took to issue with the majoritys reasoning.He disagreed that the Constitution prohibits any state from making attends or stand-ups in public libraries illegal. Second, Black argued that the previous breach of the peace cases in Louisiana differed from Brown v. Louisiana. antecedently there had been several other situations where there were peaceful inductions over discriminatory practices. get together v. Louisiana (1961) involved a sit-in at a lunch antipathetical to protest service for wh ites only. In Taylor v. Louisiana (1962) blacks again protested the presence of bus terminus that was for white customers only.In Coxv. Louisiana (1965) a man led a demonstration near the courthouse and Jail to protest the arrest of other demonstrations. Each of the protests, on with Brown v. Louisiana, was all orderly and peaceful and was over discriminatory practices that denied the protesters rights hat were guaranteed to them under the Constitution. Justice Black opposition was joined by three other Justices. They argued that the First Amendment did not guarantee to any person the right to use someone elses attribute even that owned by the presidency and dedicated to other purposes.On Wednesday, February 23, 1966 the finis was made 5 votes for Brown and 4 against him (Coates, R. , 2005). The young men won The administrations ruling in this case, along with the others, proved vital to the Civil Rights struggles and as well to the Vietnam War protests that would follow. Inde ed, without these rulings the 1960s and early 1970s may have been a only different period in time, particularly when it comes to the Civil Rights movement. In the last line of Justice Blacks opinion in Brown v.Louisiana he wrote The holding in this case today makes it more(prenominal) indispensable than ever that we stop and look more closely at where we are loss (Meyer, F. S. , 1968). In conclusion, had it not been for demonstrations of this kind, and the Supreme administration granting certiorari there is a inexpugnable possibility that none of this would have ever taken place. Oftentimes, it is in a ime of throe and suffering that the Just shall prevail, and I believe this is no different.There is more march to do but with the Supreme Court being behind you, at to the lowest degree you know its not in vain.