Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists :: essays research papers

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists From 1787-1790 the development of the American penning was a encounter between two opposing political philosophies. Americas outstrip political minds gathered in Philadelphia and other cities in the Northeast in order to find common ground in a political structure. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had both some political thoughts that agreed as well as some political thoughts that disagreed. However, both bureauies would compromise and ultimately come together. The Federalist Party, guide by James Madison, was in favor of the newly formed organic law. oneness of the main objects of the federal constitution is to secure the union and in step-up include any other affirms that would arise as a part of the union. The federal constitution would also set its aim on upward(a) the infrastructure of the union. This would include improvements on roads, accommodations for travelers, and interior navigation. A nonher consideration for the Fede ralist Constitution would be in regards to the safety of each item-by-item state. They believed that each state should find an inducement to make some sacrifices for the sake of the general protection. The Anti-Federalist Party, lead by Patrick Henry, objected to the constitution. They objected to it for a few basic reasons. Mostly the Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong a central government. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single field of study government. They were afraid that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their individual rights because a few individuals would take over. They proposed a Bill of Rights, to make certainly the citizens were protected by the law. They believed that no Bill of Rights would be equal to no check on our government for the people.